https://aclj.org/government-corruption/former-senior-obama-official-samantha-power-blames-others-for-her-unmasking-scandal
-------------------END MIKE FLYNN SPECIAL
NOTE----------------
So where we stand today with President Trump’s
transformational (Make America Great Again - MAGA)
domestic and foreign policy has a tremendous
push-back from long-held (30 years plus same ol’/same
ol’) stagnant international political traditions,
beliefs, policies and programs, bureaucractic
entrapped/entropic systems, geopolitical entrenched
forces, counter-growth economic stove-pipe
programs, trade ineffectiveness (trade imbalances)
and financial/market institutions (socialism vs.
fair trade).
The large continuous push-back is naturally coming
from all those stakeholders along with their
associated institutions (referred above) who have
held power and influence for generations (who do not
want to give it up) in their respective countries
and at the United Nations, European Union, UNSC,
WHO, WTO, et al.
Excerpt President Trump U.N. General Assembly
(09/25/18):
"I honor every
nation to pursue its own customs, beliefs and
traditions. The United States will not tell you how
to live or work or worship," Mr. Trump said."We
only ask that you honor our sovereignty in return.”
BOTTOM LINE:
Was the continuous and relentless formative foreign
and domestic push-back along with the Dossier
collection process [part of the insidious sophistry
clandestine legal push-back] a
collaborative effort: MI-6/ KGB agents, and other
intelligence agents and foreign elected/appointed
officials and special interests who had been highly
connected and intertwined to the previous
Clinton/Bush/Obama Administrations (24 years) -
Clinton election (4 more years $$$)... all willing
(plausible deniability) to contribute all they could
to stop Donald Trump (at all costs $$$) to maintain
and sustain (not change nor alter) their high-end
controlling & dominating powerful world-wide
political force .
Uranium One,
Iran, NATO (pay fair share), Brexit, Trade Policy
(fair trade not free trade giving away the shop) –
Tarriffs. In simple terms, President
Trump (President Elect-Trump - Presidential
Candidate Trump) went bigtime against the
establishments’ $$$ / Deep State's grain [gravy
train] -- foreign and domestic powers that be.
In conclusion,
President Trump changed the whole of the U.S.
National Security landscape providing sound and
practical Crisis Preparedness/Crisis Readiness
programs and policies that appropriately and
fittingly dealt with Enemies Of The State that
posed Imminent Threats to the United
States and its allies.
FISA WARRANTS
This information appearing below was first presented
in March 2018 by Chuck Floyd and Bruce J. Moran
showing that there had been clear signs that the
FISA court procedures need to be revamped and
National Security (counter-terrorism/espionage)
proceedings had been usurped by negligent parties.
The entire FISA warrant process must come under
heavy scrutiny by Congress, the Supreme Court and
the Department of Justice as the apparent failures
have occurred by grossly negligent parties who did
not properly handle, submit, review and verify
critical information which lays the groundwork for
the FISA warrant (justification process – FISA Judge
approval). Checks, counter-checks and cross-checks
for proper verification in obtaining a FISA warrant
need to be properly and fittingly addressed
(verified). National Security is put in jeopardy
when the court systems are used in fashions which do
not fit the criteria for counter-terrorism and
espionage safeguards – fail safe mechanism.
It should be duly noted that larger National
Security concerns also existed at this time as an
on-going FBI investigation commenced with regards to
Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton’s (HRC) email
server. Chuck Floyd and Bruce J. Moran published a
highly detailed investigative piercing tradecraft
article in Forbes on September
9, 2016 called: How
To Handcuff A National Security Investigation.
The big lingering National
Securitygross
negligence question from
September 2016: Who at the DOJ, DOS, FBI or another
entity/individual handled, reviewed, distributed,
advised, changed/altered/removed/replaced the email
[USG government sensitive transmittals]
classification downward from Top Secret, Secret and
Confidential?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2016/09/09/how-to-handcuff-a-national-security-investigation/
Please note how this HRC unsecured server
investigation intersects with Peter Strotz heading
up two major FBI investigations: The Hillary Clinton
Emails Unsecured Server Investigation and 2) the
Trump Russian Election Interference Collusion case.
(See below: FBI Agent Peter Strotz - Conflict Of
Interest)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/08/fitton-judicial-watch-contacted-fbi-with-evidence-hillarys-server-was-hacked-fbi-and-peter-strzok-covered-it-up-video/
Article 08/22/18 [Tom] Fitton [Judicial Watch] first
touched on Congressman
Gohmert’s admission during
the Peter Strzok hearing that a government watchdog
found that Hillary Clinton’s 30,000 emails were sent
to a foreign entity unrelated to Russia–of course
Peter Strzok and the FBI did nothing about it and
never followed up. [FBI never did anything with the evidence Judicial
Watch gave to them – Russia hacked Hillary Clinton’s
email server].
https://michronicleonline.com/2018/10/17/court-criticizes-state-department-for-providing-false-statements-on-clinton-emails/
Article 10/17/18 “I had myself (U.S. District Court
Judge Royce C. Lambreth) had found Cheryl Mills had
committed perjury and lied under oath in a published
opinion I had written in a Judicial Watch case where
I found her unworthy of belief – and I was quite
shocked she had been given immunity by the Justice
Department in the Hillary Clinton email case…So I
did not know until I read the IG report and learned
that and that she had accompanied the Secretary
(Hillary Clinton) to her [FBI] interview.
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Intelligence_Surveillance_Act
The Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 ("FISA" Pub.L.
95–511,
92 Stat. 1783, 50
U.S.C. ch.
36)
is a United
States federal law which
establishes procedures for the physical and
electronic surveillanceand
collection of "foreign intelligence information"
between "foreign powers" and "agents of foreign
powers" suspected of espionage orterrorism…
Depending on the type of surveillance, approved
orders or extensions of orders may be active for 90
days, 120 days, or a year.
FISA warrant process (application – collection of
information) must be closely investigated.
Congressman Trey Gowdy, Senator Charles Grassley,
and Senator Lindsey Graham indicate a Special
Counsel is in order. What was the rational for the
warrant presented to the FISA judges? Who signed
off on the extensions of the FISA warrants every 90
days? What was the rationale for the extensions?
FISA JUDGES DUPED BY THE FBI AGENTS
& DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE (BRUCE OHR)
----- Nellie Ohr – Fusion GPS --------
----Glenn Simpson – Owner Fusion GPS ---------
--- Simpson Refused To Testify – Took The 5th
10/12/18---
JUDGES NOT TO BLAME – WHAT IS THE FISA JUDGE’S
RESPONSIBILITY? Did inherent problems exists in
the evidence presented by the DOJ and FBI to get the
FISA warrant:
Dossier = from Fusion GPS was used as evidence to
obtain FISA Warrant
Dossier – Paid for by DNC and Hillary Clinton
Campaign – not clearly delineated (spelled out) in
the FISA warrant
Perkins Cole law firm for DNC & Clinton Campaign
payed (168k) to Steele for the Dossier – not spelled
out in FISA warrant
Dossier – Christopher Steele – MI-6 (Russian
Specialist): credibility
Dossier – Christopher Steele – leaked information to
the national media 9/16 (New Yorker, WP, Yahoo News
& CNN) that he worked for the FBI (broke cardinal
rule) Steele was “suspended then terminated” by the
FBI. Lying to an FBI officer is a felony bringing
up to 5 years in prison.
Yahoo article was used as evidence to
obtain the FISA Warrant
Dossier – Christopher Steele - Sources not clearly
identified by
Christopher Steele in how the information was
harvested.
FBI LAWYER JAMES BAKER FISA
SERIOUS PROBLEM RUSSIA PROBE (10/03/18)
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/top-fbi-lawyer-baker-offers-explosive-testimony-on-abnormal-handling-of-russia-probe-into-trump-campaign-lawmakers
Excerpts [Political Bias Evident]: "abnormal"
handling of the probe into alleged coordination
between Russian officials and the Trump presidential
campaign. “
“Baker is at the heart of surveillance abuse
allegations, and his deposition lays the groundwork for
next week's planned closed-door interview with
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. Baker, as
the FBI's top lawyer, helped secure the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant on
Page, as well as three subsequent renewals…Christopher
Steele, and Steele’s apparent bias against
then-candidate Trump, were withheld from the FISA
court…”
Most
importantly [25th Amendment
– Coup-Set Up), FBI lawyer James Baker’s testimony
greatly differs from that of Deputy Attorney General
Rod Rosenstein’s remarks in that the “Coup”
reference (after FBI Director James Comey was fired)
was to be taken seriously and acted upon (not as a
sarcastic remark Deputy Rod Rosenstein indicated.
It should be duly noted
that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein failed
to testify before Congress on Thursday October 11th?
DNC/HRC LAWYER MICHAEL SUSSMAN FISA PROBLEM
(10/03/18)
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lawyer-for-clinton-campaign-and-dnc-gave-fbi-documents-for-russia-probe-sources
“Michael Sussmann initiated
contact with him [FBI Lawyer James Baker] and provided documents
as well as computer storage devices on Russian
hacking [to the FBI]. The
sources said Baker described the contact as unusual
and the “only time it happened.”
“[Michael]
Sussmann’s contact with [FBI Lawyer James] Baker
suggests another connection between the early stages
of the FBI’s Russia probe and those working with the
DNC and Clinton campaign. Sussmann's
bio on
the Perkins Coie website describes
him as a former senior Justice Department official
with extensive
national security and cybersecurity experience: "[Sussmann]
is engaged on some of the most sophisticated,
high-stakes matters today, such as his
representation of the Democratic National Committee
and Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign in their
responses to Russian hacking in the 2016
presidential election."
Questions remain as to: 1) Did Michael Sussman work
on both the Hillary Clinton email investigation and
the FISA Warrant with Peter Strotz? 2) Did the
information given by Michael Sussman to FBI lawyer
James Baker differ than the information given by
MI-6 agent Christopher Steele? 3) If the information
differed from Christopher Steele’s information – who
[to what extent did certain individuals] handle,
review, alter, add and/or delete facts from such
critical information that went into the FISA warrant
(given to the FBI by Michael Sussman)? 4) Did such
pertinent warrant and background information
provided (by Michael Sussman to the FBI) come from
any black monies group sponsors who worked directly
or indirectly with intelligence organizations or
entities (agents) whose domestic or international
networks help substantiate parts of the background
information that went into the FISA warrant? How
does Fusion GPS Nellie Orr and Glenn Simpson (owner)
work in funding, communicating, handling, reviewing,
add and/or deleting facts from such information that
went into the FISA warrant (to the FBI by Michael
Sussman?
Read below: Conflict of Interest FBI Agent
Peter Strotz:
FBI AGENT PETER STROZK PROBLEM (CONFLICT OF
INTEREST)
CONSPIRATORIAL NATURE THAT SURROUNDS
TWO CRITICAL FBI CASES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SPECIAL NOTE: The FBI headquarters Deputy Assistant
Peter Strotz handled two (2) major concurrent cases
directed at Presidential candidates: 1) The Hillary
Clinton Email case and 2) The Russian Interference
Trump Collusion Case. He also later joined in June
2017 Robert Mueller’s Special Counsel Investigation.
IT MUST BE DULY
NOTED: FBI Headquarters
(HQ) is there to support the investigations, and
each Unit at the FBI Headquarters is part of a
Section, so there are (in order of ascension) HQ
supervisors, Unit Chiefs, Section Chiefs, Assistant
Directors, and the FBI Director James Comey. The
FBI HQ supervisor stays in contact with the field
supervisors within his assigned region and area of
crime (espionage) and reports to the Unit Chief.
FBI Headquarters personnel DO NOT conduct or direct
investigations. Those duties are in the realm of the
FBI field offices.
Most
importantly, traditionally in field offices, each
case is assigned to one single case agent who is a
field agent, or in some circumstances the case agent
and a co-case agent. The field office squad
supervisor then can order other members of the squad
to support that investigation, but each agent does
have his or her own assigned cases.
BOTTOM LINE: Why was Peter Strozk, a high ranking
Bureau manager, assigned duties to direct any
investigation? Further, for Peter Strotz to be
assigned to both key cases is a clear conflict of
interest. So there are two big inherent problems
(issues): Why is an FBI headquarters manager
directing ANY investigation; and how is it that none
of the TOP FBI management did not see FBI Agent
Strotz directing both cases as a clear Conflict
of Interest?
--------------------------------END SPECIAL
NOTE---------------------------------
Two FBI Agents: Peter Strozk & FBI Lawyer Lisa Page
Lisa Page in closed door testimony acknowledged that
there had not been any collusion – why was
information not released sooner? FBI Agent Peter
Strozk proceeded to move on collusion case with
Acting Director Andrew McCabe [Director James Comey
fired] (knowing that there had been no evidence of
collusion) to create a Special Counsel.
Conspiratorial Nature Of Special Counsel?
(Politically biased?
– Politicallly Weaponized the FISA warrant)
Liaison relationship (affair between Storzk & Page):
The Storzk & Page text messages revealed they both:
· Did
not want Hillary Clinton charged
· Did
not want Donald Trump to win
FBI Agent Peter Strozk & FBI Lawyer Lisa Page
friends with FISA Judge Rudolph Contreras (who
recused himself). Lisa Page also had an affair
(relationship) with FISA judge: Judge Rudolph
Contreras
Additional Key Information: FBI Agent Peter Strozk
interviewed Michael Flynn in the Russian collusion
case. FBI Agent Peter Strozk was also part of the
Hillary Clinton email investigation --- found on
Anthony Weiner’s computer (sent by Huma Abedin) –
which was addressed right before the November 7,
2016 Presidential elections – emails (Zero-hedge)
determined not to be a National Security problem –
no probable cause – little or no action.
https://thedailycoin.org/2018/01/31/andrew-mccabe-active-doj-investigation-sitting-weiner-laptop-emails/
Deputy FBI
Director Andrew McCabe’s recommended termination by:
1) the Justice Department Inspector General Michael
Horwitz’s internal review and the 2) the FBI’s
Office Of Professional Responsibility (OPR) – which
was forwarded such detailed information (allegations
of misconduct) from Inspector General Horwitz.
McCabe leaked Information (unauthorized disclosure)
to the Wall Street Journal regarding an on-going FBI
public corruption investigation of the Clinton
Foundation.
---Required by Statute (50 U.S.C.) a FISA order
(warrant) on an American citizen must be renewed
every 90 days and each renewal requires a separate
finding of probable cause---
Deputy FBI DirectorAndrew McCabe signed off on one
FISA warrant.
FBI Director Comey signed off on three FISA
warrants.
Acting Attorney General (AAG) Sally Yates, AAG Dana
Boente, and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein
signed off on one or more FISA warrants.
http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/02/comey-yates-mccabe-rosenstein-fisa/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/25/us/politics/steele-dossier-trump-expained.html
-
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/357213-clinton-dnc-connections-to-trump-dossier-funding-could-create-election-law
-
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/02/read-the-full-text-of-the-nunes-memo/552191/
-
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/02/24/democratic-memo-here-key-points-schiffs-document/370388002/
“And most
conspicuously, Schiff’s response is silent on one of
the most damning allegations from the Nunes memo:
That acting FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe told
the House Intelligence Committee in December that
“no surveillance warrant would have been sought from
the FISC (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court)
without the Steele dossier information.”
https://www.wsj.com/articles/who-is-christopher-steele-1518135346
“The FBI also had reason to view his research with
skepticism—on grounds of its tabloid-like
allegations, and also on the near-fantastical claim
of skill that underlay it. To wit, that a man who
had been out of official spy rings for seven years
was nonetheless able, in a matter of weeks and with
just a few calls from London, where he lives, to
unravel an international conspiracy that had eluded
the CIA, FBI, MI6 and every other Western
intelligence agency, all of which have access to the
globe’s most sophisticated surveillance tools.”
“But rather than proceed with caution, the FBI
swallowed the whole package. According to Sen. Chuck
Grassley’s declassified criminal referral, former
Director James Comey testified that the bureau
couldn’t meaningfully corroborate the dossier, but
used it in Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
proceedings anyway because Mr. Steele had previously
provided “reliable” information.”
Questions: What working relationship did FBI
Director Comey have with British Agent Steele? Did
previous associations require obtaining FISA
warrants?
The Brennan Center Report On FISA (2015):
What Went Wrong With The FISA COURT
https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/analysis/What_Went_%20Wrong_With_The_FISA_Court.pdf
Excerpts Brennan Center Report Pages 4-5:
Fundamental changes are needed to fix these [FISA
COURT] flaws. Following Snowden’s disclosures,
several bills were introduced to try to ensure that
the court would hear the other side of the argument,
generally from some type of public advocate. Other
bills addressed the court’s secrecy by requiring the
executive branch to declassify significant opinions
or release summaries. These proposals would make
important improvements, but they do not address
the full range of constitutional deficiencies
resulting from the changes in law and technology
detailed in this report. The problem with the
FISA Court is far broader than a particular
procedure or rule. The problem with the FISA Court
is FISA.
The Brennan Center report proposes a set of key
changes to FISA
to help restore the court’s legitimacy.
• Congress should end programmatic surveillance
and require the government to obtain judicial
approval whenever it seeks to obtain communications
or information involving Americans. This would
resolve many constitutional concerns.
• Congress should shore up the Article III soundness
of the FISA Court
by ensuring that the interests of those affected by
surveillance are represented in court proceedings,
increasing transparency, and facilitating the
ability of affected individuals to challenge
surveillance programs in regular federal courts.
The Brennan Center report proposes a set of key
changes to FISA
to help restore the court’s legitimacy.
• Congress should end programmatic
• Finally, Congress should address additional Fourth
Amendment concerns by ensuring that the collection
of information under the rubric of “foreign
intelligence” actually relates to our national
security and does not constitute an end-run around
the constitutional standards for criminal
investigations.
Under today’s foreign intelligence surveillance
system, the government’s ability to collect
information about ordinary Americans’ lives has
increased exponentially while judicial oversight has
been reduced to near-nothingness. Nothing less than
a fundamental overhaul of the type proposed here is
needed to restore the system to its constitutional
moorings.
--------------------END BRENNAN CENTER FISA
REPORT-----------------
Final Questions:
· U.S.
NATIONAL SECURITY RISKS:
How has National Security been compromised or put at
risk ? If so, how so?
· CONSTITUTIONAL
MOORINGS:
How has the U.S. Constitution been usurped,
undermined or circumvented? Do certain actions
create a constitutional crisis?
· COVERT
OPERATIONS: How
have covert operations (sources & methods) been
sacrificed, exposed or put at risk? [Loose Lips And
Loose USG Cybersecurity (Defensive/Offensive
Weapons) Sink Ships)?
· POLITICAL
INTERESTS & NATIONAL SECURITY: How
have political interests manipulated or sacrificed
National Security?
· U.S.
DEPARTMENTS & AGENCIES – RESPONSIBILITY &
ACCOUNTABLITY: How
have USG departments or agencies over stepped their
bounds?
· U.S.
DEPARTMENTS & AGENCIES – MANDATES: How
have USG departments or agencies fulfilled or not
fulfilled their mandates?
· INFLUENCE
OF POLITICAL OR SPECIAL INTERESTS:
Have or have not political or special interests held
sway over National Security?
· U.S.
DOMESTIC & FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE: Has
the U.S. intelligence community suffered because of
political and special interests?
· CONSTITUTIONAL
CONCERNS:
As the U.S. Supreme Court has jurisdiction over all
federal courts (judicial oversight), what role can
the Supreme Court play to ensure the U.S.
Constitution has been adhered to (not violated) and
ensure the FISA judges (robust peer review every 2
years) and the Executive Branch have acted in accord
with the U.S. Constitution (Fourth Amendment
concerns)?
APPENDIX A:
5 EYES – 9 EYES and 14 EYES (SIGNET)
The Five Eyes are cooperating with various 3rd Party
countries in at least two groups:
Five Eyes (United States, United Kingdom, Australia,
Canada, and New Zealand)
-
The "Nine Eyes", consisting of the Five Eyes
plus Denmark, France, the Netherlands, and
Norway.
-
-
The "Fourteen Eyes", consisting of the same
countries as the Nine Eyes plus Germany,
Belgium, Italy, Spain, and Sweden.
Political & Weaponized FISA Warrant:
APPENDIX B:
Obama Administration Espionage Act 1917
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/factcheck/ap-fact-check-obama-was-harsh-against-leakers/ar-BBNctjx?li=BBnb7Kz
Excerpt:
The Obama
administration used the 1917 Espionage Act with
unprecedented vigor, prosecuting more people under
that law for leaking sensitive information to the
public than all previous administrations combined. Obama's
Justice Department dug into confidential
communications between news organizations and their
sources as part of that effort.
In 2013 the Obama administration obtained the
records of 20 Associated Press office phone lines
and reporters' home and cell phones, seizing them
without notice, as part of an investigation into the
disclosure of information about a foiled al-Qaida
terrorist plot.
AP was not the target of the investigation. But it
called the seizure a "massive and unprecedented
intrusion" into its news-gathering activities,
betraying information about its operations "that the
government has no conceivable right to know."
Obama's Justice Department also secretly dogged Fox
News journalist James Rosen, getting his phone
records, tracking his arrivals and departures at the
State Department through his security-badge use,
obtaining a search warrant to see his personal
emails and naming him as a possible criminal
conspirator in the investigation of a news leak.
"The Obama
administration," The New York Times editorial
boardwrote
at the time, "has
moved beyond protecting government secrets to
threatening fundamental freedoms of the press to
gather news."
APPENDIX C: CHERRY BLOSSOM CIA TOOL KIT [VAULT 7]:
- DESIGNED
FOR HACKING HOME ROUTER MODELS
- HIGH
JACK WIRELESS NETWORKING
- MANIPULATE
& MONITOR INTERNET TRAFFIC BY BEING THE
MAN-IN-THE-MIDDLE
“CIA is using popular TV’s, smartphones, and cars to
spy on its owners.”
UNDER CIA DIRECTOR JOHN BRENNAN’S WATCH
QUESTIONS 3: 1) Did the CIA use the Cherry Blossom
Tool Kit or other CIA cybersecurity attack platforms
(code) to spy on the Senate Intelligence
Committee? Did the CIA use Cherry Blossom Tool Kit
or other CIA cybersecurity attack platforms (code)
to spy on the President Trump Campaign, Trump
family, President Trump transition team or the RNC?
3) Did the CIA use Cherry Blossom Tool Kit or other
CIA cybersecurity attack platforms (code) to spy on
any U.S. elected or appointed officials or their
families.
|